vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| In article <1113424317.793458.310270@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups .com>, c0re <spiv007@gmail.com> wrote: >when using tar.gz to backup files on the server does compression change >the files integrity? If I understand your question, the answer is no, no "integrity" is lost. Using the language usually used to describe these things, no information is lost. A file restored after backing up using tar and gz is identical to a file restored using tar alone or a file just restored from a plain copy. What you gain from compression is a smaller file. What you lose is the time and computational resoures used to compress and uncompress it. Depending on the speed of your bcakup media, it may be faster to compress->cop in->copy out->uncompress than to copy alone. > >like in gzip if i use no compression over best compression. Gzip is a good example. The "best" compression produces a smaller .gz file at the cost of a longer time to produce the compressed file. Gzip has a range of compressions so you can tune the level to meet your needs. Myself, I usually use default compression or best, but others needs may differ. > -- -- Larry Headlund lmh@world.std.com Mathematical Engineering, Inc. (617) 242 7741 Unix, X and Motif Consulting Speaking for myself at most. |