This is a discussion on it took about 6 hours for installing Oracle 10g RAC in HP-UX within the HP-UX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hi Guys, I Want to install Oracle 10g on 2 HP 9000 box. I started by reding the oracle ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi Guys, I Want to install Oracle 10g on 2 HP 9000 box. I started by reding the oracle documents. Everything installed well. but when i was executing dbca to creating database everythig started.For creating ASM Partition (2*12G) it took about 1 hour to complete. After that to create database it took about 5 hours to complete. I have a same problem when i was to import data to database when i create datafile. when i was installing Oracle 10g database it warned that i missed "Jun03GQPK11i_AUX_Patch(B.03.10.29)" software. What is that software? it seems that is something like quality package. but i installed HP-UX 11i June 2004 and GOLDQPK11i jun 2004 and every patches that oracle said in Oracle RAC document. CPU Idle time is about 100% in both boxes. Is this problem related to JAVA?Is it necessary to install JAVA patches too? Please advice. Alireza |
| |||
| Hi ! Alireza wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I Want to install Oracle 10g on 2 HP 9000 box. I started by reding the > oracle documents. Everything installed well. but when i was executing > dbca to creating database everythig started.For creating ASM Partition > (2*12G) it took about 1 hour to complete. After that to create database > it took about 5 hours to complete. Not ok. What for hardware are you using ? > I have a same problem when i was to import data to database when i > create datafile. > when i was installing Oracle 10g database it warned that i missed > "Jun03GQPK11i_AUX_Patch(B.03.10.29)" software. > What is that software? it seems that is something like quality package. It meens that is the GoldPack June 2003. > but i installed HP-UX 11i June 2004 and GOLDQPK11i jun 2004 and every > patches that oracle said in Oracle RAC document. Good. > CPU Idle time is about 100% in both boxes. > Is this problem related to JAVA?Is it necessary to install JAVA patches > too? At HPUX 11.0 and Oracle 9 we had a simliar Problem. The Java GUI timed out. It was a oracle problem. But I don't know how our dba had solved the problem - I think it was the wrong version of java for the install used - but i will ask him at monday. Alternative, have a search at irc.hp.com Lars |
| |||
| Thank you Lars, Hardwares are 2 Hp 9000 servers (9000/800/L3000-7x) I found that warning about Jun03GQPK11i_AUX_Patch(B.03.10.29) is a bug in oracle and i should ignore it.But the main problem still exist.If i want to do enything in oracle it will take a very long time.I think there is a diffrence between my problem and yours.WHEN I CREATE A DATABASE WITH DBCA IT CAN FINISH IT SUCCESSFULLY BUT TAKE ABOUT 6 HOURS TO DO (without any timeout)!!!!! Alireza |
| |||
| Hi ! Alireza wrote: > Hardwares are 2 Hp 9000 servers (9000/800/L3000-7x) > I found that warning about Jun03GQPK11i_AUX_Patch(B.03.10.29) is a bug > in oracle and i should ignore it.But the main problem still exist.If i > want to do enything in oracle it will take a very long time.I think > there is a diffrence between my problem and yours.WHEN I CREATE A Yes, it is a different problem like mine. On which operations are oracle slow ? - Have you looked with glance on your machines, and check for performance/kernel parameter issues ? > DATABASE WITH DBCA IT CAN FINISH IT SUCCESSFULLY BUT TAKE ABOUT 6 HOURS > TO DO (without any timeout)!!!!! > Strange. What does oracle or the search at itrc (itrc.hp.com) say ? Bye Lars |
| |||
| I did not find anything in itrc.hp.com. i sent this question for them too. I installed Oracle RAC without any problem, but everything started when i wanted to creat database with DBCA. I think problem is from disk array or san switch. i arranged a test. i copied a file ( with 4 G size) from local HDD to another local HDD, it took about 6 minutsto complete. another time i copied form local HDD to SAN (exactly that file with 4 G size) it took about 40 mins to complete. Is it usual? is the disk array has something to configure the speed? I have a HP Disk system 2405 & HP storageworks SAN switch 2/8-EL. I did not change the SAN Switch configuration at all, and about Disk array just made aome LUNs.Is this problem because of miss configuration on these devices? I arranged another test, i creat a local database ( just in one server), it took 6 mins to complete. So i strongly think that my problem related to Storage devices. What is your idea? Alireza |
| |||
| Hi ! Alireza wrote: > I did not find anything in itrc.hp.com. i sent this question for them > too. I installed Oracle RAC without any problem, but everything started > when i wanted to creat database with DBCA. I think problem is from disk > array or san switch. i arranged a test. i copied a file ( with 4 G > size) from local HDD to another local HDD, it took about 6 minutsto > complete. another time i copied form local HDD to SAN (exactly that > file with 4 G size) it took about 40 mins to complete. Is it usual? is > the disk array has something to configure the speed? It is not OK. I think the DS2405 is for clusters only with point to point supported - but I think it works well. Check the port settings and the speed settings on your server (fcmsutil /dev/tdX)/ switchport (portshow/portcfgshow) and array / switchport. The speed settings an the topology must be the same/matching per pair. Can you post the output of these commands ? Are the array attach redundantly ? - Test the performance again, with the alternate path - If configured. > I have a HP Disk system 2405 & HP storageworks SAN switch 2/8-EL. > I did not change the SAN Switch configuration at all, and about Disk > array just made aome LUNs.Is this problem because of miss configuration > on these devices? Ahm, you can only access the single harddisk at the ds2405, so you can't make any luns. > I arranged another test, i creat a local database ( just in one > server), it took 6 mins to complete. So i strongly think that my > problem related to Storage devices. What is your idea? > Alireza Looks like a san or storage problem. Have you already installed the latest FC, LVM and vxfs patches ? What aboout your syslog ? - Any messages ? - Are the diskdrive in the 2405 ok, or have you some read/write errors ? Lars |
| |||
| Alireza wrote: > I did not find anything in itrc.hp.com. i sent this question for them > too. I installed Oracle RAC without any problem, but everything started > when i wanted to creat database with DBCA. I think problem is from disk > array or san switch. i arranged a test. i copied a file ( with 4 G > size) from local HDD to another local HDD, it took about 6 minutsto > complete. another time i copied form local HDD to SAN (exactly that > file with 4 G size) it took about 40 mins to complete. Is it usual? is > the disk array has something to configure the speed? > I have a HP Disk system 2405 & HP storageworks SAN switch 2/8-EL. > I did not change the SAN Switch configuration at all, and about Disk > array just made aome LUNs.Is this problem because of miss configuration > on these devices? > I arranged another test, i creat a local database ( just in one > server), it took 6 mins to complete. So i strongly think that my > problem related to Storage devices. What is your idea? > Alireza For a good measurement of performance issues you can download and install glance an measure ware (free trial at openview.hp.com or software.hp.com). Also bonnie is a good tool for storage stress test. Lars |
| |||
| Thank you Lars. Yes, you are correct, problem is miss match speed in Disk Array,Switch & fiber channels. I fixed the configuration and I think everything is correct, but i have to setup some test. Regards, Alireza |
| ||||
| Hi ! Alireza wrote: > Thank you Lars. You're welcome. > Yes, you are correct, problem is miss match speed in Disk Array,Switch > & fiber channels. I fixed the configuration and I think everything is > correct, but i have to setup some test. Good. Was the switchport on autonegotiation ? Regards Lars |