This is a discussion on Upgrading 11 to 11i within the HP-UX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> I'm thinking of upgrading my HP C3000 PA-RISC machine to 11i from 11. Are there any 'gotchas' to be ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I'm thinking of upgrading my HP C3000 PA-RISC machine to 11i from 11. Are there any 'gotchas' to be aware of. I know for Solaris I've never upgraded and always done a fresh install to avoid any old baggage left around, but I'm tempted to just do an upgrade. The machine is only a home computer with very little on it, so in principle backing up to tape and restoring data would not be that much of a hassle, but if an upgrade is even less, I'll take that route. There are no node-locked packages of any form on it - just free stuff. -- "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge. Dr. David Kirkby, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Medical Physics, University College London, 11-20 Capper St, London, WC1E 6JA. Website: http://www.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/~davek Author of 'atlc' http://atlc.sourceforge.net/ |
| |||
| We have upgraded our PR7400 from 11 to 11i. Our only gothcas were problems with tape backup performance using an IBM tape driver. Other than that it has been working fine. "Dr. David Kirkby" <drkirkby@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:3F6871DF.DE63682@ntlworld.com... > I'm thinking of upgrading my HP C3000 PA-RISC machine to 11i from 11. > Are there any 'gotchas' to be aware of. I know for Solaris I've never > upgraded and always done a fresh install to avoid any old baggage left > around, but I'm tempted to just do an upgrade. > > The machine is only a home computer with very little on it, so in > principle backing up to tape and restoring data would not be that much > of a hassle, but if an upgrade is even less, I'll take that route. > > There are no node-locked packages of any form on it - just free stuff. > -- > "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably > the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge. > > Dr. David Kirkby, > Senior Research Fellow, > Department of Medical Physics, > University College London, > 11-20 Capper St, London, WC1E 6JA. > Website: http://www.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/~davek > Author of 'atlc' http://atlc.sourceforge.net/ |
| |||
| Robert wrote: > We have upgraded our PR7400 from 11 to 11i. Our only gothcas were problems > with tape backup performance using an IBM tape driver. Other than that it > has been working fine. > > > "Dr. David Kirkby" <drkirkby@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:3F6871DF.DE63682@ntlworld.com... > >>I'm thinking of upgrading my HP C3000 PA-RISC machine to 11i from 11. >>Are there any 'gotchas' to be aware of. I know for Solaris I've never >>upgraded and always done a fresh install to avoid any old baggage left >>around, but I'm tempted to just do an upgrade. >> >>The machine is only a home computer with very little on it, so in >>principle backing up to tape and restoring data would not be that much >>of a hassle, but if an upgrade is even less, I'll take that route. >> >>There are no node-locked packages of any form on it - just free stuff. >>-- >>"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably >>the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge. >> >>Dr. David Kirkby, >>Senior Research Fellow, >>Department of Medical Physics, >>University College London, >>11-20 Capper St, London, WC1E 6JA. >>Website: http://www.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/~davek >>Author of 'atlc' http://atlc.sourceforge.net/ > I am in the process of designing a 11-> 11i migration, best bet so far, get a new disk and install 11i on that clean. That way you can go back and forth if needed. The real gotcha is that you need to make sure all your apps will work, aint there yet :-( |
| |||
| "Dr. David Kirkby" <drkirkby@ntlworld.com> writes: > I'm thinking of upgrading my HP C3000 PA-RISC machine to 11i from 11. > Are there any 'gotchas' to be aware of. I know for Solaris I've never > upgraded and always done a fresh install to avoid any old baggage left > around, but I'm tempted to just do an upgrade. 11.00 to 11.11 was the smoothest update ever. However I'd recommend to read the installation and upgrading guide, backup your system (make_recovery), and build a installation depot with current applications, OE, and patches. For huge machines, every reboot saved is worth an extra coffee break. Regards, Ulrich > > The machine is only a home computer with very little on it, so in > principle backing up to tape and restoring data would not be that much > of a hassle, but if an upgrade is even less, I'll take that route. > > There are no node-locked packages of any form on it - just free stuff. > -- > "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably > the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge. > > Dr. David Kirkby, > Senior Research Fellow, > Department of Medical Physics, > University College London, > 11-20 Capper St, London, WC1E 6JA. > Website: http://www.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/~davek > Author of 'atlc' http://atlc.sourceforge.net/ |
| |||
| Ulrich Windl wrote: > > "Dr. David Kirkby" <drkirkby@ntlworld.com> writes: > > > I'm thinking of upgrading my HP C3000 PA-RISC machine to 11i from 11. > > Are there any 'gotchas' to be aware of. I know for Solaris I've never > > upgraded and always done a fresh install to avoid any old baggage left > > around, but I'm tempted to just do an upgrade. > > 11.00 to 11.11 was the smoothest update ever. However I'd recommend to > read the installation and upgrading guide, backup your system > (make_recovery), and build a installation depot with current > applications, OE, and patches. For huge machines, every reboot saved > is worth an extra coffee break. > > Regards, > Ulrich Thanks for that. The machine has very little on it - gcc, acrobat reader and a few freebies in /usr/local. That is about it. I'm still hunting for an HP C compiler. From what you and others say it is no big deal, so I'll do an upgrade. -- "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge. Dr. David Kirkby, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Medical Physics, University College London, 11-20 Capper St, London, WC1E 6JA. Website: http://www.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/~davek Author of 'atlc' http://atlc.sourceforge.net/ |
| |||
| Alan Johnson wrote: > I am in the process of designing a 11-> 11i migration, best bet so far, > get a new disk and install 11i on that clean. That way you can go back > and forth if needed. The real gotcha is that you need to make sure all > your apps will work, aint there yet :-( The clean disk idea is nice, but I don't have such a disk. It's a home machine, which rarely gets used apart from checking portability of software, so I don't tend to want to spend too much money on it. As long as gcc works that is all I really care about. If that don't work I'm up the creak without a paddle, but there is nothing else on it that I can not do without. One might well argue there is no point in me upgrading. That is probably a very valid point, but given I got the CDs it seems worth doing. -- "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge. Dr. David Kirkby, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Medical Physics, University College London, 11-20 Capper St, London, WC1E 6JA. Website: http://www.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/~davek Author of 'atlc' http://atlc.sourceforge.net/ |
| |||
| Upgrade itself is really easy. But to start the upgrade you need to have enough free space in the file systems / /stand /usr /opt /var and /tmp. So if you have separate file systems and /stand is too small you have some extra work. Paul |
| ||||
| "Paul Sure" <phv_temp@yahoo.com> writes: > Upgrade itself is really easy. But to start the upgrade you need to have > enough free space in the file systems / /stand /usr /opt /var and /tmp. So > if you have separate file systems and /stand is too small you have some > extra work. When filesystems like /stand weer too small, we used make_tape_recovery to backup the system, the boot that tape to interactively restore with larger filesystem sizes. It's more fool-proof than messing with single-user yourself BTW... Regards, Ulrich > > Paul |