This is a discussion on 2.6.1 and Unable to mount Root partition within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> I'm making my first attempts at getting a 2.6 kernel running on my Debian (Sarge) box. Upon boot I ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I'm making my first attempts at getting a 2.6 kernel running on my Debian (Sarge) box. Upon boot I get "Kernel Panic: Unable to mount VFS "305" or /dev/hda5 root partition" or something similar. /dev/hda5 is ext3 and ext3 has been selected to be built into the kernel (via menuconfig). The disk itself is fine: I reboot into my old 2.4.20 kernel w/o problem. gcc 3.3.2 tune2fs 1.35 module-init-tools 3.0-pre2 Any suggestions? -j |
| |||
| JVarsoke uttered the immortal words: > I'm making my first attempts at getting a 2.6 kernel running on my > Debian (Sarge) box. Upon boot I get "Kernel Panic: Unable to mount > VFS "305" or /dev/hda5 root partition" or something similar. > /dev/hda5 is ext3 and ext3 has been selected to be built into the > kernel (via menuconfig). Adding append="ramdisk_size=8192" to lilo.conf did it for me. I can't see the point of upgrading to 2.6 yet though. The system I tested 2.6.0 on ran a lot slower and the sound card, which works beautifully with the 2.4 kernel, wouldn't work. I'll wait until 2.6 gets to 2.6.4 or later before I try it in anger. -- Andy. |
| |||
| Andy Fraser <andyfraser31@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<uop8d1-481.ln1@news.linuxuser.org.uk>... > JVarsoke uttered the immortal words: > > > I'm making my first attempts at getting a 2.6 kernel running on my > > Debian (Sarge) box. Upon boot I get "Kernel Panic: Unable to mount > > VFS "305" or /dev/hda5 root partition" or something similar. > > /dev/hda5 is ext3 and ext3 has been selected to be built into the > > kernel (via menuconfig). > > Adding append="ramdisk_size=8192" to lilo.conf did it for me. Nope, same error. I've also tried: eliminating "lba32" from lilo. mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd-2.6.1.img 2.6.1 w/ initrd=/boot/initrd-2.6.1.img in LILO CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y Don't know what else to try. Suggestions? -j |
| |||
| Andy Fraser <andyfraser31@hotmail.com> schrieb: >I can't see the point of upgrading to 2.6 yet though. The system I tested >2.6.0 on ran a lot slower and the sound card, which works beautifully with >the 2.4 kernel, wouldn't work. I can tell other story. Since 2.6.0-test3 I tried all prereleases and run 2.6.1 now. It is more responsive, particular on network connections, and sound works great with the integrated alsa driver. There seems to be some problems with USB memory devices, though. Eggert |
| |||
| On Monday 12 Jan 2004 10:08 am, Eggert Ehmke uttered these immortal words: >>I can't see the point of upgrading to 2.6 yet though. The system I tested >>2.6.0 on ran a lot slower and the sound card, which works beautifully with >>the 2.4 kernel, wouldn't work. > > I can tell other story. Since 2.6.0-test3 I tried all prereleases and > run 2.6.1 now. It is more responsive, particular on network > connections, and sound works great with the integrated alsa driver. > There seems to be some problems with USB memory devices, though. I've pretty much left the 2.6 kernel alone until now, too much other stuff to do :-) I can remember the move from 2.2 to 2.4 was painless. I think, for now at least, the move to 2.6 isn't going to be so easy. -- Andy. |
| |||
| usenet.9.jvarsoke@spamgourmet.com (JVarsoke) wrote in message news:<bfa58f21.0401112133.5553e0a4@posting.google. com>... > Andy Fraser <andyfraser31@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<uop8d1-481.ln1@news.linuxuser.org.uk>... > > JVarsoke uttered the immortal words: > > > > > I'm making my first attempts at getting a 2.6 kernel running on my > > > Debian (Sarge) box. Upon boot I get "Kernel Panic: Unable to mount > > > VFS "305" or /dev/hda5 root partition" or something similar. > > > /dev/hda5 is ext3 and ext3 has been selected to be built into the > > > kernel (via menuconfig). > > > > Adding append="ramdisk_size=8192" to lilo.conf did it for me. > > Nope, same error. > > I've also tried: > eliminating "lba32" from lilo. > > mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd-2.6.1.img 2.6.1 w/ > initrd=/boot/initrd-2.6.1.img in LILO > CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y > CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y > CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y > > Don't know what else to try. Suggestions? > > -j Have you installed the DEVFSD package? I was getting tons of errors like yours until I installed this package. |
| ||||
| usenet.9.jvarsoke@spamgourmet.com (JVarsoke) wrote in message news:<bfa58f21.0401111230.63df5852@posting.google. com>... > I'm making my first attempts at getting a 2.6 kernel running on my > Debian (Sarge) box. Upon boot I get "Kernel Panic: Unable to mount > VFS "305" or /dev/hda5 root partition" or something similar. > /dev/hda5 is ext3 and ext3 has been selected to be built into the > kernel (via menuconfig). > > The disk itself is fine: I reboot into my old 2.4.20 kernel w/o > problem. > > gcc 3.3.2 > tune2fs 1.35 > module-init-tools 3.0-pre2 > > Any suggestions? > > -j I am successfully running kernel 2.6.1 on redhat 9. I faced the same problem "Kernel Panic: Unable to mount VFS "305" or /dev/hda5 root partition" My root partition was ext3 and default option for kernel compilation makes ext3 filesystem to load as module. I compiled ext3 filesystm into my kernel and the root partition was mounted without an error after that. |