This is a discussion on Development System Windows2k - Linux [BORING] within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hello everybody, I am currently running windows 2k on a k7s5A motherboard + AMDXP1800 + 40 GB + 512 ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello everybody, I am currently running windows 2k on a k7s5A motherboard + AMDXP1800 + 40 GB + 512 DDR 2100. I have no need for wonderful audio video, as I use my system for research/office/development. Now it is becoming increasingly impel lent for me to have a linux box (to run Globus Toolkit 3 and other Middleware services development related), and I don't want to install it on my PC, as I wouldn't be able to use both OSes at once. There is already an eth100 network with an ADSL router (for Internet access) and other hosts attached to a eth100 network. The hosts require file and backup (and maybe proxy, and maybe configuration when I have time to experiment) services from a server, which would ideally be always on. Currently the file/backup services are provided by my w2k machine, but I do switch it off when I sleep and so everybody in the house gets cut off. I was thinking of getting a new box, which I would then add to my eth100 network and access through ssh (for command line stuff) and some remote desktop software (what could I use?) from my windows machine. I was also thinking of keeping my linux box always on, to provide to the home network all the wonderful services. Furthermore, for what I understand, Linux is a truly multiuser OS and therefore I would be able to login locally and remotely at once, as a feature of the OS itself (no third party stuff as for windows). Obviously the hardware of my new computer is going to be much more powerful than my current one (not becuase I fancy fashion upgrading... It is just that 2 years have passed since I got my current machine, and prices drop...): I am not sure if I should instead use the new computer as my desktop (I do some heavy development with Borland and I guess I would go faster with a newer machine, more RAM etc...), and move the existing computer to the role of Linux server. But... I don't know much about how the load would get distributed... What kind of load multiple sessions put on the machine? I guess it very much depends on the kind of programs I am running, but I am particularly thinking about multiple X sessions at this stage... What kind of resources am I going to exhaust quickly? And what about the client machine (w2k)? How is the load distributed betweek client and server? Is the eth100 network going to sustain remote desktop connection and LAN file transfers and Internet traffic all at once? Please note I have a switch (not a hub) at the centre of my star topology, and I suppose that helps (i.e. no unnecessary level 2 broadcasts). I would really appreciate *any* comment before I embark on my upgrade, as I don't exactly feel confident about the thousands things I may have not thought of. I am also interested in knowing how developers who have to deal with windows/linux have set things up to maximise productivity. TIA Mario PS = Off topic, shall I use British English or American English to write posts, if I am to follow good netiquette principles? |