vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Does there exist software that would allow me to hook up my linux computer to another computer (not necessarily linux; presume that it is dos) and have the dos computer print to it's parallel port, and my linux computer receive the file the DOS computer wants to print ? The linux computer would essentially be emulating the printer to the DOS computer. I am sure that printer manufacturers must have software like this, but is it possible for me to do it ? --Rob |
| |||
| Rob Ristroph wrote: > > Does there exist software that would allow me to hook up my linux > computer to another computer (not necessarily linux; presume that it > is dos) and have the dos computer print to it's parallel port, and my > linux computer receive the file the DOS computer wants to print ? No, not to its parallel port, but across a network, yes. -- Paul Lutus http://www.arachnoid.com |
| |||
| rgr@sdf.lonestar.org (Rob Ristroph) wrote in message news:<87brt9ol3s.fsf@rgristroph-austin.ath.cx>... > Does there exist software that would allow me to hook up my linux > computer to another computer (not necessarily linux; presume that it > is dos) and have the dos computer print to it's parallel port, and my > linux computer receive the file the DOS computer wants to print ? > > The linux computer would essentially be emulating the printer to the > DOS computer. > > I am sure that printer manufacturers must have software like this, but > is it possible for me to do it ? > > --Rob If it was coming out of a serial port, it would be easy. Just run a terminal emulator on the Linux computer, and capture everything sent over the serial line. Over 15 years ago, one of the smaller computer magazines complained that they couldn't print a complete assembler listing, because they had no way of generating such a list except to a printer. It was obvious that if they set up another computer in the way I suggested, it could capture the output, and the main computer would never know if there was a printer or a computer attached to the serial port. I'm not sure what the solution would be if the output has to be to the parallel output, because there isn't a general program that takes things in from the parallel port. You'd have to poke around and find something that is taking in data from the parallel port for some reason, and hope that it's general enough that it can be useful in your application. Maybe there's some logging program that is used with test equipment or something. Michael |
| ||||
| >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Black <blackm00@cam.org> writes: Michael> Michael> rgr@sdf.lonestar.org (Rob Ristroph) wrote in message news:<87brt9ol3s.fsf@rgristroph-austin.ath.cx>... >> Does there exist software that would allow me to hook up my linux >> computer to another computer (not necessarily linux; presume that >> it is dos) and have the dos computer print to it's parallel port, >> and my linux computer receive the file the DOS computer wants to >> print ? >> >> The linux computer would essentially be emulating the printer to >> the DOS computer. >> >> I am sure that printer manufacturers must have software like this, >> but is it possible for me to do it ? >> >> --Rob Michael> Michael> If it was coming out of a serial port, it would be easy. Michael> Just run a terminal emulator on the Linux computer, and Michael> capture everything sent over the serial line. Michael> Michael> Over 15 years ago, one of the smaller computer magazines Michael> complained that they couldn't print a complete assembler Michael> listing, because they had no way of generating such a list Michael> except to a printer. It was obvious that if they set up Michael> another computer in the way I suggested, it could capture the Michael> output, and the main computer would never know if there was a Michael> printer or a computer attached to the serial port. Michael> Michael> I'm not sure what the solution would be if the output has to Michael> be to the parallel output, because there isn't a general Michael> program that takes things in from the parallel port. You'd Michael> have to poke around and find something that is taking in data Michael> from the parallel port for some reason, and hope that it's Michael> general enough that it can be useful in your application. Michael> Maybe there's some logging program that is used with test Michael> equipment or something. Michael> Michael> Michael I will find some sort of parallel port monitoring program, or else make one by modifying some simple code that accesses the parallel port. I am worried that fancy printers might do too talking back and forth and handshaking. I'll see if I can set up one computer to print to a generic postscript printer on the parallel port, and see if I can get a postscript file out of the log on the other end. --Rob |