Unix Technical Forum

only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM ?

This is a discussion on only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM ? within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> does this mean I need a newer version of rpm program? I'm running Linux-Mandrake 7.1 GPL . ------------------------------------------start-------------------------------------------- [root@localhost ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Linux Operating System

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:25 PM
Onismus Radebe
 
Posts: n/a
Default only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM ?

does this mean I need a newer version of rpm program? I'm running Linux-Mandrake 7.1 GPL .


------------------------------------------start--------------------------------------------

[root@localhost /tmp]# rpm -qpi ksh93-2000.10.31.0-1.i386.rpm
only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM
query of ksh93-2000.10.31.0-1.i386.rpm failed
[root@localhost /tmp]#

------------------------------------------end--------------------------------------------

Thanx in advance.

-- \|/
Onismus o o
__________________________________oOO_(_)_OOo_____ _________________________
E-Business and Information Management | Tel: +27 11 350 3414
Knowledge Discovery & Dissemination | Fax: +27 11 350 8585
onismusr-AT-absa-DOT-co-DOT-za | Cel: +27 83 591 5310
__________________________________________________ _________________________

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:25 PM
Leon.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM ?

"Onismus Radebe" <onismusrATabsaDOTcoDOTza@za> wrote in message
news:3ffb9da5$0$216@hades.is.co.za...
>does this mean I need a newer version of rpm program? I'm running

Linux-Mandrake 7.1 GPL .

Yes. why ?

you might be suprised to find that 4 is NOT <= 3. 4 is > 3.


here ends your free lessons.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:28 PM
Onismus Radebe
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM ?


"Leon." <noemail@noemail.noemail.com> wrote in message
news:3ffbd1b4$1@news.rivernet.com.au...
> "Onismus Radebe" <onismusrATabsaDOTcoDOTza@za> wrote in message
> news:3ffb9da5$0$216@hades.is.co.za...
> >does this mean I need a newer version of rpm program? I'm running

> Linux-Mandrake 7.1 GPL .
>
> Yes. why ?
>
> you might be suprised to find that 4 is NOT <= 3. 4 is > 3.
>
>
> here ends your free lessons.
>
>


It's my understanding that Mandrake is using the same package manager as
redhat. So I downloaded rpm version 4 (for redhat 7.2) and i got the
dependency errors. Maybe I should also mention that I've been using linux
for 3 months so I'm still a newbie.

[root@localhost /tmp]# rpm -i --test rpm-4.0.3-1.03.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
popt = 1.6.3 is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
libbz2.so.1 is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.3) is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
[root@localhost /tmp]#


Thanx in advance

-- \|/
Onismus o o
__________________________________oOO_(_)_OOo_____ _________________________
E-Business and Information Management | Tel: +27 11 350 3414
Knowledge Discovery & Dissemination | Fax: +27 11 350 8585
onismusr-AT-absa-DOT-co-DOT-za | Cel: +27 83 591 5310
__________________________________________________ _________________________

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:31 PM
Nico Kadel-Garcia
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM ?


"Onismus Radebe" <onismusrATabsaDOTcoDOTza@za> wrote in message
news:3ffe4281$0$215@hades.is.co.za...
>
> "Leon." <noemail@noemail.noemail.com> wrote in message
> news:3ffbd1b4$1@news.rivernet.com.au...
> > "Onismus Radebe" <onismusrATabsaDOTcoDOTza@za> wrote in message
> > news:3ffb9da5$0$216@hades.is.co.za...
> > >does this mean I need a newer version of rpm program? I'm running

> > Linux-Mandrake 7.1 GPL .
> >
> > Yes. why ?
> >
> > you might be suprised to find that 4 is NOT <= 3. 4 is > 3.
> >
> >
> > here ends your free lessons.
> >
> >

>
> It's my understanding that Mandrake is using the same package manager as
> redhat. So I downloaded rpm version 4 (for redhat 7.2) and i got the
> dependency errors. Maybe I should also mention that I've been using linux
> for 3 months so I'm still a newbie.
>
> [root@localhost /tmp]# rpm -i --test rpm-4.0.3-1.03.i386.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> popt = 1.6.3 is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
> libbz2.so.1 is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.3) is needed by rpm-4.0.3-1.03
> [root@localhost /tmp]#


You can't just swap random packages from RedHat releases into Mandrake. You
probably need to recompile from the SRPM, in order to address the library
dependencies which will be fairly distinct for your particular distribution.

But why not use the latest Mandrake RPM package instead?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com