vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I just got a new computer and decided the old one would be a good linux machine. some specs: duron 700, fic az11e mobo, maxtor 15gb drive (don't know the model number off hand), 256mb ram, gf1 ddr 32mb video and assorted other cards. I got RH 9 and tried to install. I told the installation to nuke all (windows) partitions on the drive and start fresh. I used the autoconfig option. I got the end of the installation messages (package choosing) and told it to go. It formatted the HD fine and then errored when "copying installation image to hard drive". The status bar got to ~72% when a message came up that said something like "problems installing image to hard drive. your hard drive may be full". I went back through the installation setup and told it to put the boot loader (grub, but same thing happens with lilo or no boot loader) on the boot partition (hda1) instead of the hda master boot record. The status bar got to ~83% and then quit. I'm assuming by the symptoms that it's trying to put something in the MBR that doesn't fit and freeing up some room by putting the boot loader somewhere else makes it quit later in its attempt to do so. I then decided to go and get a new hard drive... A WB 80gb thing with the 8mb of cache. Installed that and the symptoms are identical. I goofed around with my mobo BIOS settings and did stuff like turn an MBR virus scanner off, but to no avail....same problem. ANY suggestions would be appreciated, since my google-fu hasn't been good enough to turn up any similar problems or answers or FAQs that touch on this. Thanks in advance! |
| |||
| Did you do a media test first? Paul wrote: > I just got a new computer and decided the old one would be a good > linux machine. > > some specs: duron 700, fic az11e mobo, maxtor 15gb drive (don't know > the model number off hand), 256mb ram, gf1 ddr 32mb video and assorted > other cards. > > I got RH 9 and tried to install. I told the installation to nuke all > (windows) partitions on the drive and start fresh. I used the > autoconfig option. I got the end of the installation messages > (package choosing) and told it to go. It formatted the HD fine and > then errored when "copying installation image to hard drive". The > status bar got to ~72% when a message came up that said something like > "problems installing image to hard drive. your hard drive may be > full". I went back through the installation setup and told it to put > the boot loader (grub, but same thing happens with lilo or no boot > loader) on the boot partition (hda1) instead of the hda master boot > record. The status bar got to ~83% and then quit. I'm assuming by > the symptoms that it's trying to put something in the MBR that doesn't > fit and freeing up some room by putting the boot loader somewhere else > makes it quit later in its attempt to do so. > > I then decided to go and get a new hard drive... A WB 80gb thing with > the 8mb of cache. Installed that and the symptoms are identical. I > goofed around with my mobo BIOS settings and did stuff like turn an > MBR virus scanner off, but to no avail....same problem. ANY > suggestions would be appreciated, since my google-fu hasn't been good > enough to turn up any similar problems or answers or FAQs that touch > on this. Thanks in advance! |
| |||
| On 12 Dec 2003 12:27:08 -0800, rand17_24@yahoo.com (Paul) wrote: >I just got a new computer and decided the old one would be a good >linux machine. > >some specs: duron 700, fic az11e mobo, maxtor 15gb drive (don't know >the model number off hand), 256mb ram, gf1 ddr 32mb video and assorted >other cards. > >I got RH 9 and tried to install. I told the installation to nuke all >(windows) partitions on the drive and start fresh. I used the >autoconfig option. I got the end of the installation messages >(package choosing) and told it to go. It formatted the HD fine and >then errored when "copying installation image to hard drive". The >status bar got to ~72% when a message came up that said something like >"problems installing image to hard drive. your hard drive may be >full". I went back through the installation setup and told it to put >the boot loader (grub, but same thing happens with lilo or no boot >loader) on the boot partition (hda1) instead of the hda master boot >record. The status bar got to ~83% and then quit. I'm assuming by >the symptoms that it's trying to put something in the MBR that doesn't >fit and freeing up some room by putting the boot loader somewhere else >makes it quit later in its attempt to do so. > >I then decided to go and get a new hard drive... A WB 80gb thing with >the 8mb of cache. Installed that and the symptoms are identical. I >goofed around with my mobo BIOS settings and did stuff like turn an >MBR virus scanner off, but to no avail....same problem. ANY >suggestions would be appreciated, since my google-fu hasn't been good >enough to turn up any similar problems or answers or FAQs that touch >on this. Thanks in advance! Do a google on the error message. I had the same problem....Two solutions. Mine was the switch linux = nocddma......can't remember the other solution. Hope this helps __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><> |
| |||
| Jason Bowen <jason.bowen@colorado.edu> wrote in message news:<zsCdnQnJcpFtqUeiRVn-uw@comcast.com>... > Did you do a media test first? > > of the RH disks or my hard drive? Answer is out of the 10-15 install tries I've done, I only tested the RH media the first time through and skipped it the rest of the times. Good to go. I did a bad block check on my first hard drive and it said something like "bad cylinders found on your HD, Linux recommends you not use it. I'm quitting now". At that point is when I decided to go and get the new HD, which I might be falsely assuming is OK, I'll go and run through media checks for everything now that you have me all paranoid 8-). But same symptoms with each one......go figure. |
| |||
| refv2@attbi.net wrote in message news:<jvrktv0buv4jnuk7haq2kif1rvovd2a89k@4ax.com>. .. > > Do a google on the error message. I had the same problem....Two > solutions. Mine was the switch linux = nocddma......can't remember > the other solution. Hope this helps > Thanks! I googled the error message and it seems to be pretty widespread. Hmm, 2 things: 1) I wonder why I couldn't find it when I googled before with admittedly different keywords (but that's no big deal now), and 2) People were having this problem back with RH 7.something....and it's still a problem through fedora? Hmmmm. Anyways, some solutions I gleaned were: 1) Shaky solution where one should put the CD drive as a slave off of the primary IDE channel instead of a master on the secondary IDE. This didn't work for me. (from a bugzilla post) 2) Your suggestion, but slightly different. Should be "linux nodma". Another one was "linux allowcddma", which seems contradictory. Haven't tried either yet (I will this evening), but a lot of people found success with the first statement. (and fyi, edit the /etc/grub.conf after install to eliminate this as the problem only manifests during install....) 3) Perhaps a media error. Some people found their media to be corrupted and downloaded it again and it seemed to work.....*shrug* That's what I'm doing now. I'm going to do option #2 with the new media from option #3 tonight. Hopefully it will work. |
| |||
| On 13 Dec 2003 12:45:54 -0800, rand17_24@yahoo.com (Paul) wrote: >refv2@attbi.net wrote in message news:<jvrktv0buv4jnuk7haq2kif1rvovd2a89k@4ax.com>. .. >> > >2) Your suggestion, but slightly different. Should be "linux nodma". >Another one was "linux allowcddma", which seems contradictory. >Haven't tried either yet (I will this evening), but a lot of people >found success with the first statement. (and fyi, edit the >/etc/grub.conf after install to eliminate this as the problem only >manifests during install....) > >3) Perhaps a media error. Some people found their media to be >corrupted and downloaded it again and it seemed to work.....*shrug* >That's what I'm doing now. > >I'm going to do option #2 with the new media from option #3 tonight. >Hopefully it will work. Heh, Heh......My solution, in fact, was the allowcddma switch. Just forgot......Sorry for the wrong advice, but I think it put you on the right track. Later __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><> |
| |||
| refv2@attbi.net wrote in message news:<5qbntv8obhui1kitr61jrq2l0tg4cvql63@4ax.com>. .. > On 13 Dec 2003 12:45:54 -0800, rand17_24@yahoo.com (Paul) wrote: > > >refv2@attbi.net wrote in message news:<jvrktv0buv4jnuk7haq2kif1rvovd2a89k@4ax.com>. .. > >> > > > >2) Your suggestion, but slightly different. Should be "linux nodma". > >Another one was "linux allowcddma", which seems contradictory. > >Haven't tried either yet (I will this evening), but a lot of people > >found success with the first statement. (and fyi, edit the > >/etc/grub.conf after install to eliminate this as the problem only > >manifests during install....) > > > >3) Perhaps a media error. Some people found their media to be > >corrupted and downloaded it again and it seemed to work.....*shrug* > >That's what I'm doing now. > > > >I'm going to do option #2 with the new media from option #3 tonight. > >Hopefully it will work. > > Heh, Heh......My solution, in fact, was the allowcddma switch. Just > forgot......Sorry for the wrong advice, but I think it put you on the > right track. > > Later > > Yup, it worked. And I'm all installed now....thanks for the help! |
| ||||
| On 15 Dec 2003 06:54:44 -0800, rand17_24@yahoo.com (Paul) wrote: >refv2@attbi.net wrote in message news:<5qbntv8obhui1kitr61jrq2l0tg4cvql63@4ax.com>. .. >> On 13 Dec 2003 12:45:54 -0800, rand17_24@yahoo.com (Paul) wrote: >> >> >refv2@attbi.net wrote in message news:<jvrktv0buv4jnuk7haq2kif1rvovd2a89k@4ax.com>. .. >> >> >> > >> >2) Your suggestion, but slightly different. Should be "linux nodma". >> >Another one was "linux allowcddma", which seems contradictory. >> >Haven't tried either yet (I will this evening), but a lot of people >> >found success with the first statement. (and fyi, edit the >> >/etc/grub.conf after install to eliminate this as the problem only >> >manifests during install....) >> > >> >3) Perhaps a media error. Some people found their media to be >> >corrupted and downloaded it again and it seemed to work.....*shrug* >> >That's what I'm doing now. >> > >> >I'm going to do option #2 with the new media from option #3 tonight. >> >Hopefully it will work. >> >> Heh, Heh......My solution, in fact, was the allowcddma switch. Just >> forgot......Sorry for the wrong advice, but I think it put you on the >> right track. >> >> Later >> >> > >Yup, it worked. And I'm all installed now....thanks for the help! Glad to hear. Have fun! __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><> |