vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I'm using an IBM ThinkCentre with their Rescue and Recovery software. According to IBM, I can't install any other OS w/o impacting the ability to use R&R. Below is IBM's reply -- is there any way to install Linux without breaking R&R? "Regarding your recent question about loading a second operating system onto your machine and the impact this may have on your ability to use the Rescue & Recovery application; we are not aware of any dual boot configurations which will work correctly with Rescue & Recovery. In addition, the only two operating systems currently supported with R&R are Windows 2000 and Windows XP. In order for Rescue & Recovery to function properly, the software must be able to load components into the Windows OS and it must have access to the hidden partition and Windows Preinstallation Environment. Rescue & Recovery currently requires 8 contiguous free sectors within the MBR (Master Boot Record) and non-standard partitions involving more than one operating system can fail to maintain the integrity of the MBR sufficiently for use by ThinkVantage Technology applications such as Rescue & Recovery. .... Additional considerations regarding Rescue and Recovery v3.0 can be viewed at URL: http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/si...tyle=lenovo&ln docid=MIGR-61190 Please reply to the newsgroup. Thanks |
| |||
| As long as you have an available partition, other than the R&R partition and the Windows partition, you can install there. If you don't have an available partition you can repartition Windows to get one. If you are worried about overwriting the MBR you can use Windows multi-boot feature. What is the R&R partition actually used for? |
| |||
| David Gurvich wrote: > As long as you have an available partition, other than the R&R partition > and the Windows partition, you can install there. If you don't have an > available partition you can repartition Windows to get one. If you are > worried about overwriting the MBR you can use Windows multi-boot feature. > > What is the R&R partition actually used for? If the OS wont boot up, it'll automatically boot up into a special mode, which would allow some utlities to be run - including restoring the system. Windows multi-boot doesn't use the MBR? Of course MS' website only describes how to set up Windows multi-boot with MS OSes... Are there any websites which talk about using Windows multiboot with Linux? Thanks |
| |||
| I don't remember the specifics as I prefer using other boot loaders. However, you need a bootsector image that points to the OS partition that you want to boot. I believe you could actually use grub for that. Before you go looking into that, see if you can boot into the R&R partition using grub from a livecd. If you can, then you needn't worry about overwriting the MBR as you could always access the R&R partition. |
| |||
| On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:57:30 -0800, danr_18 wrote: > > David Gurvich wrote: >> As long as you have an available partition, other than the R&R partition >> and the Windows partition, you can install there. If you don't have an >> available partition you can repartition Windows to get one. If you are >> worried about overwriting the MBR you can use Windows multi-boot feature. >> >> What is the R&R partition actually used for? > > If the OS wont boot up, it'll automatically boot up into a special > mode, which would allow some utlities to be run - including restoring > the system. > > Windows multi-boot doesn't use the MBR? Since the Windows boot loader is already on the MBR, using it ( instead of lilo/grub ) is less likely to interfere with access to the R&R partition. > Of course MS' website only > describes how to set up Windows multi-boot with MS OSes... Are there > any websites which talk about using Windows multiboot with Linux? Google on "Windows boot loader linux". I haven't done it, so I can't say if any reference is better than another, but that will turn up tons of info. Probably the safest, least intrusive way would be to install Linux onto a 2nd hard drive, leaving the original untouched, and use a boot loader on a floppy for Linux. Some distributions offer this as an option during setup, IIRC. -- - Matt - |
| |||
| On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 02:57:30 +0100, <danr_18@yahoo.com> wrote: > > David Gurvich wrote: >> As long as you have an available partition, other than the R&R partition >> and the Windows partition, you can install there. If you don't have an >> available partition you can repartition Windows to get one. If you are >> worried about overwriting the MBR you can use Windows multi-boot feature. >> >> What is the R&R partition actually used for? > > If the OS wont boot up, it'll automatically boot up into a special > mode, which would allow some utlities to be run - including restoring > the system. > > Windows multi-boot doesn't use the MBR? Of course MS' website only > describes how to set up Windows multi-boot with MS OSes... Are there > any websites which talk about using Windows multiboot with Linux? I don't know about that, but Grub does overwrite more than just the sector zero. It "embeds" the "stage1_5" file into 15 sectors or so, I guess it will take the ones the support mail told about. It is quite possible that you could install grub into the partition, in which case Grub will not be the teh one to get controll transferred to it from the BIOS during boot. Windows has a file boot.ini, where you can specify a list of partitions you want to boot from. I don't know for sure, however, if it does chain properly into Grub on a partition, does anyone know? I seem to remember having seen the answer is yes, I'm not sure. -Enrique |
| |||
| danr_18@yahoo.com wrote: <snip> > operating system can fail to maintain the integrity of the MBR > sufficiently for use by ThinkVantage Technology applications such as > Rescue & Recovery. > ... > Additional considerations regarding Rescue and Recovery v3.0 can be > viewed > at URL: > http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/si...tyle=lenovo&ln > docid=MIGR-61190 > > Please reply to the newsgroup. > > Thanks Assuming you are creating new partitions, install grub to the *partition* where /boot resides. Then in fdisk change the active partition to the /boot partition. Set up grub to boot windows for you as well. This will leave the R&R and Windows untouched because you are telling the BIOS there is actually a different active partition. I've done this work around on other systems. |
| ||||
| On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 11:20:01 +0000, Matt Payton wrote: > Probably the safest, least intrusive way would be to install Linux onto a > 2nd hard drive, leaving the original untouched, and use a boot loader on a > floppy for Linux. Some distributions offer this as an option during > setup, IIRC. Better yet, move the present Windows drive, otherwise untouched, to the slave position on the first IDE controller, make the new drive master, install Linux on the new hda drive, and install grub in the MBR of hda. You get the standard grub menu, with the choice of Linux or Windows, and no floppy to mess with, or lose. I boot five Linux and four Windows OSs like this, with the Windows drives on hde, and hdg. Any repairs to Windows will only overwrite the MBR of the drive that Windows is installed on, and will not overwrite the MBR of hda, leaving grub untouched. -- imotgm "Lost? Lost? I've never been lost... Been a tad confused for a month or two, but never lost." |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|