This is a discussion on Re: GRUB question within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> [followups set to comp.os.linux.setup] On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:56:27 GMT, Douglas Mayne wrote: > I would at least ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| [followups set to comp.os.linux.setup] On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:56:27 GMT, Douglas Mayne wrote: > I would at least try this stanza in grub (the command can also be entered > at the grub shell at startup): > > Title Windows XP > rootnoverify (hd0,0) > makeactive > chainloader +1 > > Provide proper values for (hdx,y) if (hd0,0) is not correct. It works for Windows 2000. I don't think Windows 2000 honors the "active flag"; I use "makeactive" anyway. I've had perfect success with those four lines. |
| |||
| Jules Dubois wrote: > [followups set to comp.os.linux.setup] > > On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:56:27 GMT, Douglas Mayne wrote: > > >>I would at least try this stanza in grub (the command can also be entered >>at the grub shell at startup): >> >>Title Windows XP >> rootnoverify (hd0,0) >> makeactive >> chainloader +1 >> >>Provide proper values for (hdx,y) if (hd0,0) is not correct. > > > It works for Windows 2000. I don't think Windows 2000 honors the "active > flag"; I use "makeactive" anyway. I've had perfect success with those four > lines. I mad the same changes, but I still got the W2K boot loader, am I missing something? Thanks |
| |||
| On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 23:32:39 -0600, Ko Fei Pu wrote: > Jules Dubois wrote: >> [followups set to comp.os.linux.setup] >> >> On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:56:27 GMT, Douglas Mayne wrote: >> >> >>>I would at least try this stanza in grub (the command can also be >>>entered at the grub shell at startup): >>> >>>Title Windows XP >>> rootnoverify (hd0,0) >>> makeactive >>> chainloader +1 >>> >>>Provide proper values for (hdx,y) if (hd0,0) is not correct. >> >> >> It works for Windows 2000. I don't think Windows 2000 honors the >> "active flag"; I use "makeactive" anyway. I've had perfect success >> with those four lines. > > I mad the same changes, but I still got the W2K boot loader, am I > missing something? > > Thanks > Using grub as the loader causes the slight inconvience of going through two boot menus: the grub menu followed by the windows boot menu. The point is it works. How much time are you going to be spending rebooting anyway ? -- insert windows joke here. ;-) --Douglas Mayne |
| ||||
| Ko Fei Pu wrote: >>> Title Windows XP >>> rootnoverify (hd0,0) >>> makeactive >>> chainloader +1 > > > I mad the same changes, but I still got the W2K boot loader, am I > missing something? Apparently so. Look at http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr... e.com&rnum=4 and follow the directions. Craig |