Unix Technical Forum

Re: GRUB question

This is a discussion on Re: GRUB question within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> [followups set to comp.os.linux.setup] On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:56:27 GMT, Douglas Mayne wrote: > I would at least ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Linux Operating System

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:48 AM
Jules Dubois
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: GRUB question

[followups set to comp.os.linux.setup]

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:56:27 GMT, Douglas Mayne wrote:

> I would at least try this stanza in grub (the command can also be entered
> at the grub shell at startup):
>
> Title Windows XP
> rootnoverify (hd0,0)
> makeactive
> chainloader +1
>
> Provide proper values for (hdx,y) if (hd0,0) is not correct.


It works for Windows 2000. I don't think Windows 2000 honors the "active
flag"; I use "makeactive" anyway. I've had perfect success with those four
lines.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:48 AM
Ko Fei Pu
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: GRUB question

Jules Dubois wrote:
> [followups set to comp.os.linux.setup]
>
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:56:27 GMT, Douglas Mayne wrote:
>
>
>>I would at least try this stanza in grub (the command can also be entered
>>at the grub shell at startup):
>>
>>Title Windows XP
>> rootnoverify (hd0,0)
>> makeactive
>> chainloader +1
>>
>>Provide proper values for (hdx,y) if (hd0,0) is not correct.

>
>
> It works for Windows 2000. I don't think Windows 2000 honors the "active
> flag"; I use "makeactive" anyway. I've had perfect success with those four
> lines.


I mad the same changes, but I still got the W2K boot loader, am I
missing something?

Thanks

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:48 AM
Douglas Mayne
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: GRUB question

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 23:32:39 -0600, Ko Fei Pu wrote:

> Jules Dubois wrote:
>> [followups set to comp.os.linux.setup]
>>
>> On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:56:27 GMT, Douglas Mayne wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I would at least try this stanza in grub (the command can also be
>>>entered at the grub shell at startup):
>>>
>>>Title Windows XP
>>> rootnoverify (hd0,0)
>>> makeactive
>>> chainloader +1
>>>
>>>Provide proper values for (hdx,y) if (hd0,0) is not correct.

>>
>>
>> It works for Windows 2000. I don't think Windows 2000 honors the
>> "active flag"; I use "makeactive" anyway. I've had perfect success
>> with those four lines.

>
> I mad the same changes, but I still got the W2K boot loader, am I
> missing something?
>
> Thanks
>

Using grub as the loader causes the slight inconvience of going through
two boot menus: the grub menu followed by the windows boot menu. The
point is it works. How much time are you going to be spending
rebooting anyway ? -- insert windows joke here. ;-)

--Douglas Mayne
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008, 06:48 AM
Craig McCluskey
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: GRUB question

Ko Fei Pu wrote:
>>> Title Windows XP
>>> rootnoverify (hd0,0)
>>> makeactive
>>> chainloader +1

>
>
> I mad the same changes, but I still got the W2K boot loader, am I
> missing something?


Apparently so. Look at

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr... e.com&rnum=4

and follow the directions.


Craig

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com