vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I cloned my SuSE-9.3 HDD w/LILO 22.7 installed in MBR. (i.e. I have both HDDs installed in one server). For the case of exactly the same ROOT partitions contained /boot directory: simple DD from sda2 to sdb2 (plus DD of MBR sector) looks OK. But if I use dump/restore procedure for clone of the ROOT partition filesystem (ext3) and then issue (from rescue mode, for example) something like chroot /mnt /sbin/lilo -t then I see the error message raid_setup: stat ("/dev/sda") (the same message appears at /mnt/sbin/lilo -t -r /mnt) I don't have any raid - in particular, in /etc/lilo.conf :-) It looks for me that /boot/map file copied via dump/restore from the "source" HDD is inappropriate for using for lilo execution :-( This situation (w/message about raid) remains if I remove "source" HDD and use only installation CD booting w/1 target HDD. How is possible to solve this problem ? Mikhail Kuzminsky Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry Moscow |
| |||
| On 26 Mar, 19:46, Mikhail Kuzminsky <k...@free.net> wrote: > I cloned my SuSE-9.3 HDD w/LILO 22.7 installed in MBR. (i.e. I have > both HDDs installed in one server). > > For the case of exactly the same ROOT partitions contained /boot > directory: > simple DD from sda2 to sdb2 (plus DD of MBR sector) looks OK. > > But if I use dump/restore procedure for clone of the ROOT partition > filesystem (ext3) and then issue (from rescue mode, for example) > something like > > chroot /mnt /sbin/lilo -t > > then I see the error message > > raid_setup: stat ("/dev/sda") > (the same message appears at */mnt/sbin/lilo -t -r /mnt) > > I don't have any raid - in particular, in /etc/lilo.conf :-) > It looks for me that /boot/map file copied via dump/restore from the > "source" HDD is inappropriate for using for lilo execution :-( > > This situation (w/message about raid) remains if I remove "source" HDD > and use only installation CD booting w/1 target HDD. > > How is possible to solve this problem ? > > Mikhail Kuzminsky > Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry > Moscow Number one, switch to grub. The increased flexibility and capability of grub justifies this. Number two, it's not clear that you haven't done any other hardware changes. For example, if your drives have wound up renumbered due to additional SCSI devices or SCSI-looking devices, such as an external USB cd drive used to boot your OS, you may have a bit of a problem there. Perhaps you should post your lilo.conf and /etc/fstab so we can better understand your issue? |
| |||
| On 27 อมา, 10:53, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 26 Mar, 19:46, Mikhail Kuzminsky <k...@free.net> wrote: > > I cloned my SuSE-9.3 HDD w/LILO 22.7 installed in MBR. (i.e. I have > > both HDDs installed in one server). > > For the case of exactly the same ROOT partitions contained /boot > > directory: > > simple DD from sda2 to sdb2 (plus DD of MBR sector) looks OK. > > But if I use dump/restore procedure for clone of the ROOT partition > > filesystem (ext3) and then issue (from rescue mode, for example) > > something like > > > chroot /mnt /sbin/lilo -t > > > then I see the error message > > > raid_setup: stat ("/dev/sda") > > (the same message appears at /mnt/sbin/lilo -t -r /mnt) > > > I don't have any raid - in particular, in /etc/lilo.conf :-) > > It looks for me that /boot/map file copied via dump/restore from the > > "source" HDD is inappropriate for using for lilo execution :-( > > > This situation (w/message about raid) remains if I remove "source" HDD > > and use only installation CD booting w/1 target HDD. > > > How is possible to solve this problem ? > > > Mikhail Kuzminsky > > Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry > > Moscow > > Number one, switch to grub. :-) I just switched (some time ago) from grub to lilo back :-) The reason was just the need of some tricks if I clone one HDD w/SuSE to other. LILO looked for me as more simple and "transparent". > Number two, it's not clear that you haven't done any other hardware > changes. For example, if your drives have wound up renumbered due to > additional SCSI devices or SCSI-looking devices, such as an external > USB cd drive used to boot your OS, you may have a bit of a problem > there. It looks as not the reason of the problem. I see this message in 2 cases a) if I have 2 HDDs (source and target) installed simultaneously - both HDD are SATA, and in this case I really have renumbering (target HDD is /dev/sdb) b) if I boot from install CD in rescue mode w/ONE target HDD installed. In the last case there is no HDDs renumbering. > Perhaps you should post your lilo.conf and /etc/fstab so we can better > understand your issue?> /etc/fstab (I remember that if I perform dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/sdb2 all looks OK w/LILO): /dev/sda2 / ext3 acl,user_xattr 1 1 /dev/sda1 /dos vfat users,gid=users,umask=0002,utf8=true 0 0 /dev/sda6 /home xfs defaults 1 2 /dev/sda5 /usr ext3 acl,user_xattr 1 2 /dev/sda3 swap swap defaults 0 0 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs noauto 0 0 debugfs /sys/kernel/debug debugfs noauto 0 0 usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs noauto 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts mode=0620,gid=5 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/floppy auto noauto,user,sync 0 0 /dev/cdrecorder /media/cdrecorder auto ro,noauto,user,exec 0 0 /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom auto ro,noauto,user,exec 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,noauto,user,exec 0 0 ================================================== ======= /etc/lilo.conf: # Modified by YaST2. Last modification on Sat Aug 25 18:13:44 UTC 2007 menu-scheme = Wb:kw:Wb:Wb timeout = 200 lba32 change-rules reset read-only prompt default = SL_10.1 message = /boot/message boot = /dev/sda image = /boot/vmlinuz ###Don't change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: linux### label = SL_10.1 append = " resume=/dev/sda3 splash=silent showopts" vga = 0x314 initrd = /boot/initrd root = /dev/sda2 other = /dev/sda1 ###Don't change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: windows### label = Windows image = /boot/vmlinuz ###Don't change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: failsafe### label = Failsafe append = "showopts ide=nodma apm=off acpi=off noresume edd=off3" vga = normal initrd = /boot/initrd root = /dev/sda2 image = /boot/memtest.bin ###Don't change this comment - YaST2 identifier: Original name: memtest86### label = Memory_Test ================================================== ================= Yours Mikhail |
| ||||
| Mikhail Kuzminsky wrote: > I cloned my SuSE-9.3 HDD w/LILO 22.7 installed in MBR. (i.e. I have > both HDDs installed in one server). > > For the case of exactly the same ROOT partitions contained /boot > directory: > simple DD from sda2 to sdb2 (plus DD of MBR sector) looks OK. > > But if I use dump/restore procedure for clone of the ROOT partition > filesystem (ext3) and then issue (from rescue mode, for example) > something like > > chroot /mnt /sbin/lilo -t > > then I see the error message > > raid_setup: stat ("/dev/sda") > (the same message appears at /mnt/sbin/lilo -t -r /mnt) > > I don't have any raid - in particular, in /etc/lilo.conf :-) > It looks for me that /boot/map file copied via dump/restore from the > "source" HDD is inappropriate for using for lilo execution :-( > > This situation (w/message about raid) remains if I remove "source" HDD > and use only installation CD booting w/1 target HDD. > > How is possible to solve this problem ? > > Mikhail Kuzminsky > Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry > Moscow Have a look at :http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Hard-Disk-Upgrade/prepare.html If you've done your lilo configuration right... it'll work. -- Jerry McBride (jmcbride@mail-on.us) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|