Unix Technical Forum

Re: Partition troubles on a GIANT storage server

This is a discussion on Re: Partition troubles on a GIANT storage server within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> On 2008-01-23, Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@begone.spam.duke.edu> wrote: > On 2008-01-23, Ignoramus11153 <ignoramus11153@NOSPAM.11153.invalid> wrote: >> >> Linux sees that array as ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Linux Operating System

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 07:45 AM
Ignoramus11153
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Partition troubles on a GIANT storage server

On 2008-01-23, Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@begone.spam.duke.edu> wrote:
> On 2008-01-23, Ignoramus11153 <ignoramus11153@NOSPAM.11153.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> Linux sees that array as /dev/sdb. The capacity is 5 TB (as I said).
>> fdisk sees it as follows:
>>
>> ### Disk /dev/sdb: 5249.9 GB, 5249921187840 bytes
>> ### 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 638266 cylinders
>> ### Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>> ### Disk identifier: 0xcf00cb1c
>> ###
>> ### Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> ### /dev/sdb1 1 267349 2147480811 5 Extended
>> ### /dev/sdb5 1 267349 2147480779+ 83 Linux
>>
>> Which is the way I want. I formatted this disk with fdisk a while
>> ago. There is one giant extended partition, and a almost the same size
>> logical partition inside, holding Linux data.

>
> fdisk does not support a device that big. You must use parted. I also
> rather hope that you're using a GPT disklabel, as standard (msdos) ones also
> don't work on a device that large.


OK.

>> The device /dev/sdb5 is mounted on /data. However, df -k /data says:
>>
>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/sdb5 2113784952 239323764 1767087152 12% /data
>>
>> The above is wrong (or at least is not the way I expect), as I expect
>> 1K-blocks count to say 5 million instead of 2 million.

>
> Yep, it's wrong. The safest thing to do is backup the data somwhere else,
> recreate the partition (with parted), reformat, and *verify* before putting
> data on the system that everything is working correctly.


Yes. I scheduled data backup for 1am tonight, I will double verify it
in the morning and will redo partitioning.


> As an aside, there's really no need to use an extended partition on a device
> you'll only have one partition on anyway. Just create one primary partition
> and format that.
>


Fair enough. So, the plan is:

1) Backup the data at 1am tonight
2) In the morning, verify backup
3) umount /data
4) use gparted to repartition. Create one primary partition only, and
label it as linux
5) mkfs -t ext3 /dev/sdb1
6) remount
7) restore the backup.

i
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com