This is a discussion on Simple Newbie question about contradictory errors within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Linux is free. Linux is powerful. But it is contradictory. My copy of wu-ftpd seems not installed right. I ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Linux is free. Linux is powerful. But it is contradictory. My copy of wu-ftpd seems not installed right. I tried to update my version with #rpm -Uvh. Rpm says I have the most recent version (2.6.2-11.73.1). I tried to uninstall with #rpm -e AND now rpm returns the error: package is NOT installed!?!?? WTF? Why is linux so confusing this way? I know its installed. Most of the questions I post here are because i cant tell what bash is thinking. |
| |||
| neon_bikini wrote: > Linux is free. Linux is powerful. But it is contradictory. > > My copy of wu-ftpd seems not installed right. I tried to update my > version with #rpm -Uvh. Rpm says I have the most recent version > (2.6.2-11.73.1). I tried to uninstall with #rpm -e AND now rpm returns > the error: package is NOT installed!?!?? > > WTF? Why is linux so confusing this way? I know its installed. Most of > the questions I post here are because i cant tell what bash is > thinking. What was the command you used? rpm -e wu-ftpd Or: rpm -e wu-ftpd-2.6.2-11.73.1 Do not add the "i386.rpm" when using the "-e" option. -- Confucius: He who play in root, eventually kill tree. Registered with The Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org/ Slackware 9.1.0 Kernel 2.4.22 i686 (GCC) 3.3.2 Uptime: 12 days, 3:36, 2 users, load average: 1.07, 1.22, 1.1 |
| |||
| neon_bikini <neon_bikini@hotmail.com> wrote: > My copy of wu-ftpd seems not installed right. I tried to update my > version with #rpm -Uvh. Rpm says I have the most recent version > (2.6.2-11.73.1). I tried to uninstall with #rpm -e AND now rpm returns > the error: package is NOT installed!?!?? It is installed. You asked it to uninstall something else - probably the file name instead of the package name. > WTF? Why is linux so confusing this way? It isn't. You are. Start telling the computer what you mean. > I know its installed. It is installed. Nobody disagrees with you, least of all the computer. You can confirm using rpm. > Most of > the questions I post here are because i cant tell what bash is > thinking. It isn't thinking. It doesn't think. You have to do the thinking. That means that you have to be accurate. You aren't. We know that because you don't even bother to show us your rpm command so that we can tell you what is wrong with it - if you THOUGHT, you would conclude that EITHER your command was wrong or the computer was wrong, and showing us the command would allow us to tell you which. But Noooooo ... you insist on not showing yourself up as fallible in front of a mere machine, and hence you insist on claiming false things. You lie, even to yourself! Why? To preserve your face in front of a computer or your self esteem? It's weird. Peter |
| ||||
| neon_bikini wrote: > Linux is free. Linux is powerful. But it is contradictory. > > My copy of wu-ftpd seems not installed right. I tried to update my > version with #rpm -Uvh. Rpm says I have the most recent version > (2.6.2-11.73.1). I tried to uninstall with #rpm -e AND now rpm returns > the error: package is NOT installed!?!?? > > WTF? Why is linux so confusing this way? Because you don't think it's important to type anyting specific. How do I know? You didn't bother to post what you actually typed. > I know its installed. Then prove it. Post the output of: # rpm -qa | grep -i wu-ftp > Most of > the questions I post here are because i cant tell what bash is > thinking. No, the problem is not that you can't tell what bash is thinking, it is that we can't tell what you are thinking -- or typing. -- Paul Lutus http://www.arachnoid.com |