This is a discussion on Teaching standard init config... within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> On 27 Nov 2005, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.setup, in article <1133103091.860200.145000@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>, Kronocide wrote: >As stated above there ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On 27 Nov 2005, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.setup, in article <1133103091.860200.145000@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>, Kronocide wrote: >As stated above there is of course a time limit, and no limit at all to >the amount of stuff I'd like to teach. I hear it. >I wish I could teach them all about init, but that's just not possible. I >also do not want to make my instructions so abstract they become >meaningless. My lesson on getting Apache to start from boot shouldn't be, >"Learn how your distro works. Configure it correctly." They don't need me >to tell them that. Yes, as I mention in my followup to Nico, there should be pre-requisites for the course that include using _something_ as an editor, having some concept of how to use man pages, etc. Running a server insecurely is easy to "teach" - microsoft does it by default. The Linux distributions have worked hard to escape that mentality. If you don't have the experience, in the mid-1990s, if there was a cracked Linux box out there, it was usually running daemons galore, _out_of_box, with NO thought of security. Hate to recall how many Red Hat boxes of yore were exploited as open spam servers with a wide open Sendmail install. That has changed. >What I'll do is have them go through the motions of compiling and >installing a standard Apache distro That _might_ be a bit much - compiling is not a ten minute lesson either. >then they can choose if they want to reinstall using their package >manager I know we're pushed for time, but it's generally preferable to have them use the package manager - yes, it's another long story. >or figure out their init config. Remember that most distribution specific tools are just helping to configure the "normal" script/config-files for a daemon. If they know where/what the normal configurations are, they're ahead. As for trying to teach the ninety-nine different helper tools provided by the various distributions - good luck. >I will point them to the KSysV handbook, which contains a short, >principal explanation of init, and also to the HOWTO recommended >above (thanks!) for more in-depth information. As mentioned, just giving them an oversight of the way things start is going to go a long way. The HOWTOs, the LDP guides, etc, are a great source of extra information - I know students don't like homework, but it shows them the extensive information that's available. Old guy |
| ||||
| Kronocide writes: > What I'll do is have them go through the motions of compiling and > installing a standard Apache distro... If you are short on time this is one the things you should leave out. > ...then they can choose if they want to reinstall using their package > manager... Installing the deb or rpm supplied with the distribution _is_ the "standard way". Have the do that and learn to configure Apache, and then let them mess around with compiling if there is time. -- John Hasler john@dhh.gt.org Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA |