Unix Technical Forum

yum "issue"

This is a discussion on yum "issue" within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Please direct me to the "right" group, if this is the wrong one... Can someone explain the following behavior??? ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Linux Operating System

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2008, 08:40 AM
Bruce Bowler
 
Posts: n/a
Default yum "issue"

Please direct me to the "right" group, if this is the wrong one...

Can someone explain the following behavior???

[root@modis ~]# yum check-update
Setting up repositories
updates-released 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
Reading repository metadata in from local files
primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 347 kB 00:14
updates-re: ################################################## 965/965
Added 27 new packages, deleted 28 old in 3.43 seconds

cpuspeed.i386 1:1.2.1-1.23_FC4 updates-released
gnome-utils.i386 1:2.10.0-4 updates-released
microcode_ctl.i386 1:1.12-1.24_FC4 updates-released
ruby.i386 1.8.3-2.fc4 updates-released
ruby-debuginfo.i386 1.8.3-2.fc4 updates-released
ruby-devel.i386 1.8.3-2.fc4 updates-released
ruby-docs.i386 1.8.3-2.fc4 updates-released
ruby-libs.i386 1.8.3-2.fc4 updates-released
ruby-mode.i386 1.8.3-2.fc4 updates-released
ruby-tcltk.i386 1.8.3-2.fc4 updates-released
termcap.noarch 1:5.4-7fc4 updates-released
[root@modis ~]# yum update
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
updates-released 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
Reading repository metadata in from local files
primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 333 kB 00:13
updates-re: ################################################## 966/966
Added 28 new packages, deleted 27 old in 2.90 seconds
No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion
[root@modis ~]#

Thanks!
Bruce

--
+-------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
Bruce Bowler | Nothing comes from nothing, Nothing ever will -
1.207.633.9600 | Rodgers&Hammerstein
bbowler@bigelow.org |
+-------------------+---------------------------------------------------+

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2008, 08:40 AM
HASM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: yum "issue"

Bruce Bowler <bbowler@bigelow.org> writes:

> Please direct me to the "right" group, if this is the wrong one...
> Can someone explain the following behavior???


> [root@modis ~]# yum check-update
>cpuspeed.i386 1:1.2.1-1.23_FC4 updates-released
> ...
> Added 27 new packages, deleted 28 old in 3.43 seconds
> ...
> [root@modis ~]# yum update
> ...
> Added 28 new packages, deleted 27 old in 2.90 seconds
> No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion


You probably have more that one place where you get updates-released from
(check your yum.repos.d/files) and they're not fully synced.

The first one has 27 packages newer than your current installation. The
second has none (and updating from there deleted the info on those 27
packages).

When all the sites you update from are in sync you'll get those packages.
Or you can try one by one and see which one has the latest.

-- HASM

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2008, 08:40 AM
Nico Kadel-Garcia
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: yum "issue"


"HASM" <not_really@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:m3wtkugvnr.fsf@127.0.0.1...
> Bruce Bowler <bbowler@bigelow.org> writes:
>
>> Please direct me to the "right" group, if this is the wrong one...
>> Can someone explain the following behavior???

>
>> [root@modis ~]# yum check-update
>>cpuspeed.i386 1:1.2.1-1.23_FC4 updates-released
>> ...
>> Added 27 new packages, deleted 28 old in 3.43 seconds
>> ...
>> [root@modis ~]# yum update
>> ...
>> Added 28 new packages, deleted 27 old in 2.90 seconds
>> No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion

>
> You probably have more that one place where you get updates-released from
> (check your yum.repos.d/files) and they're not fully synced.


That sounds exactly right. It's often helpful to go through the list of
mirrors yourself and find a really good local one, or if you're supporting
more than a few machines to create a local rsync-derived mirror of the
update site and use that for local installations. It really makes things
faster, especially if you have to update a lot of machines all at the same
time.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com