This is a discussion on Mapping SVM metadevices back to a specific StorEdge 3310 ( mirrored ) within the Sun Solaris Hardware forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> I have 2 StorEdge 3310 arrays, mirrored using Solaris9 SVM disksets ( the arrays are also shared between 2 ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I have 2 StorEdge 3310 arrays, mirrored using Solaris9 SVM disksets ( the arrays are also shared between 2 hosts ). I have a need to break the mirror and do some work on one array, and do the same on the other array. During that time, the SVM mirrors will only have 1 submirror. How can I be sure that the metadevices that I am de-attaching and removing from the diskset is from the correct 3310 that I need to work on ( remote location ) ? Using sccli, I have: # /opt/SUNWsscs/sbin/sccli Available devices: 1. /dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s2 [SUN StorEdge 3310 SN#000202] (Primary) 2. /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2 [SUN StorEdge 3310 SN#00094F] (Primary) Please enter selection: .... and the metadevices are on the following disks: # metastat -s shared3310 -p | grep c shared3310/d51 1 1 c3t0d4s0 shared3310/d52 1 1 c4t0d4s0 shared3310/d21 1 1 c3t0d3s0 shared3310/d22 1 1 c4t0d3s0 shared3310/d41 1 1 c3t0d2s0 shared3310/d42 1 1 c4t0d2s0 shared3310/d31 1 1 c3t0d1s0 shared3310/d32 1 1 c4t0d1s0 shared3310/d1 1 1 c3t0d0s0 shared3310/d2 1 1 c4t0d0s0 It seems obvious, but I want to make sure: Is it a correct assumption that disks c3t0dxs0 above are in the 3310 array: 1. /dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s2 [SUN StorEdge 3310 SN#000202] (Primary) ... and disks c4t0dxs0 above are in the 3310 array: 2. /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2 [SUN StorEdge 3310 SN#00094F] (Primary) ?? Checking the device path for the disk array themselves: # ls -alt /dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 52 Mar 1 2005 /dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s2 -> ../../devices/pci@8,600000/pci@1/scsi@4/sd@0,0:c,raw # ls -alt /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 52 Apr 5 2005 /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2 -> ../../devices/pci@8,600000/pci@1/scsi@5/sd@0,0:c,raw Now for the actual disks that Solaris sees: # ls -alt /dev/rdsk/c3t0d4s0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 52 Mar 4 2005 /dev/rdsk/c3t0d4s0 -> ../../devices/pci@8,600000/pci@1/scsi@4/sd@0,4:a,raw # ls -alt /dev/rdsk/c4t0d4s0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 52 Apr 5 2005 /dev/rdsk/c4t0d4s0 -> ../../devices/pci@8,600000/pci@1/scsi@5/sd@0,4:a,raw So the actual disk's device path seems to match the array's device path, which leads me to conclude that disks c3t0dxs0 above are in the 3310 array: 1. /dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s2 [SUN StorEdge 3310 SN#000202] (Primary) ... and disks c4t0dxs0 above are in the 3310 array: 2. /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2 [SUN StorEdge 3310 SN#00094F] (Primary) Am I correct in my assumption ?? Thanks, John |
| ||||
| js wrote: > > So the actual disk's device path seems to match the array's device path, > which leads me to conclude that disks c3t0dxs0 above are in the 3310 > array: > 1. /dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s2 [SUN StorEdge 3310 SN#000202] (Primary) > > .. and disks c4t0dxs0 above are in the 3310 array: > 2. /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2 [SUN StorEdge 3310 SN#00094F] (Primary) > > > > Am I correct in my assumption ?? > > > Thanks, > > John Jumped the gun ... it seems my assumption is correct. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|